How Scientists Learned to Starve Cancer
The story of angiogenesis research reveals how a radical idea can transform from heresy to medical breakthrough, revolutionizing our fight against cancer and other diseases.
Imagine a tiny tumor, no larger than a pencil tip, quietly residing in an organ. For months, it remains harmlessâbarely noticeable. Then, it makes a decisive move: it sends out signals to recruit its own blood supply. Within weeks, what was once a microscopic cluster transforms into an aggressive, life-threatening growth. This crucial transitionâthe ability to create new blood vesselsârepresents one of medicine's most pivotal discoveries in understanding disease.
This process, called angiogenesis, plays a vital role not only in cancer but in over 70 diseases, from macular degeneration that steals eyesight to diabetic wounds that refuse to heal. The story of how scientists came to understand and ultimately manipulate blood vessel growth is a tale of scientific perseverance, paradigm-shifting thinking, and revolutionary breakthroughs that have changed how we approach medicine today 1 .
Angiogenesis is not just a cancer phenomenonâit's involved in over 70 different diseases, making it one of the most important biological processes in medicine.
For most of medical history, blood vessels were considered passive plumbingânecessary infrastructure that simply responded to the tissue around it. The revolutionary idea that tumors could actively create their own blood supply was first proposed by Dr. Judah Folkman in 1971. His hypothesis was bold and controversial: tumor growth depends on angiogenesis 8 .
Folkman suggested that tumor cells and vascular endothelial cells within a neoplasm constitute a highly integrated ecosystem. He speculated that endothelial cells could be switched from a resting state to a rapid growth phase by a "diffusible" chemical signal from tumor cellsâand that blocking this process could be a viable therapeutic strategy 8 .
The visionary surgeon and researcher who first proposed that tumor growth depends on angiogenesis, facing years of skepticism before his ideas were accepted.
Proposes angiogenesis hypothesis
First angiogenesis inhibitors discovered
First anti-angiogenic drug approved by FDA
Many researchers believed angiogenesis couldn't be manipulated therapeutically since newly formed vessels would quickly become permanent fixtures 8 .
This pessimistic atmosphere made angiogenesis research challenging. As Folkman later recalled, producing compelling evidence that tumor growth depended on neovascularization was "not an easy task." Acceptance was slowâit would take two more years before the first vascular endothelial cells were successfully cultured, eight years until capillary endothelial cells could be grown in vitro, eleven years until the discovery of the first angiogenesis inhibitor, and thirteen years until the purification of the first angiogenic protein 8 .
For decades after Folkman's hypothesis, scientists assumed that new blood vessels in tumors were formed exclusively from endothelial cells migrating from nearby existing vessels. But in 2001, a groundbreaking experiment revealed a surprising new dimension to the angiogenesis storyâone that originated not in the tumor itself, but deep within our bones.
Researchers at Weill Medical College of Cornell University and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center designed an elegant experiment to identify the origin of cells contributing to tumor angiogenesis 7 :
The findings overturned conventional wisdom. The transplanted mice developed widespread metastases and died within 26 days, mirroring the tumor growth observed in normal animals. When researchers examined the tumors, they made a crucial discovery: the blue bone-marrow-derived cells appeared throughout the majority of newly formed blood vessels in the tumors 7 .
Even more compelling was the reverse experimentâwhen Id-deficient marrow was placed into wild-type mice, tumor growth was dramatically delayed. This demonstrated that bone-marrow-derived cells weren't just passive bystanders; they were actively promoting and potentially required for new blood vessel formation 7 .
Cell Type | VEGF Receptor | Primary Function | Role in Angiogenesis |
---|---|---|---|
VEGFR2+ Circulating Endothelial Precursors | VEGFR2 | Form blood vessel walls | Incorporate into vessel lining |
VEGFR1+ Hematopoietic Precursors | VEGFR1 | Create blood cells | Support and stabilize new vessels |
The clinical implications were profound. When researchers targeted these cells with neutralizing antibodies, blocking either VEGFR1 or VEGFR2 alone only partially inhibited tumor growth. But when both receptors were blocked simultaneously, tumor formation was completely prevented 7 .
This experiment revealed that the "whole story" of tumor growth wasn't contained solely within the tumor itself. The bone marrow played an indispensable role in fueling cancer's blood supplyâopening entirely new avenues for therapeutic intervention.
While the bone marrow experiment revealed new cellular actors, years of painstaking research were required to identify the molecular signals that orchestrate angiogenesis. The most important of these discoveries was Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF).
VEGF emerged as the crucial regulator of angiogenesis, with its action on endothelial cells mediated primarily through two tyrosine kinase receptors: VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 2 . What makes VEGF particularly significant is that a subset of endothelial cells at sites of angiogenesisâespecially in tumor growth areasâexpress significantly higher levels of VEGFR-2 than quiescent endothelial cells, making it an ideal target for therapeutic intervention 2 .
The critical importance of VEGF was confirmed through genetic studies in the 1990s that showed embryos lacking a single VEGF allele died in utero with severe blood vessel deformities 5 . This demonstrated that VEGF dosage was crucial for normal vascular development.
The discovery of VEGF and its receptors opened the floodgates for therapeutic development. The first blockbuster anti-angiogenic drug, bevacizumab (Avastin), was a monoclonal antibody that directly targets VEGF-A. Approved by the FDA in 2004, it became the pioneer in a new class of cancer therapeutics 2 .
Drug Name | Target | Primary Cancer Applications | Year Approved |
---|---|---|---|
Bevacizumab (Avastin) | VEGF-A | Colorectal, lung, renal, glioblastoma | 2004 |
Sunitinib (Sutent) | VEGF receptors, PDGF receptors | Renal, gastrointestinal stromal tumor | 2006 |
Sorafenib (Nexavar) | VEGF receptors, RAF kinase | Renal, hepatocellular carcinoma | 2005 |
Pazopanib (Votrient) | VEGF receptors, PDGF receptors | Renal, soft tissue sarcoma | 2009 |
Angiogenesis-related drugs in clinical development
Diseases with angiogenesis involvement
Today's angiogenesis researchers have an extensive arsenal of techniques and tools at their disposal. These methods have evolved significantly from the early days of vascular biology.
Tool/Technique | Primary Use | Key Features | Applications |
---|---|---|---|
HUVECs (Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells) | In vitro studies | Cryopreserved, express endothelial markers | Tube formation, migration studies |
Matrigel/Geltrex | 3D cell culture | Simulates extracellular matrix | Tube formation assays |
Corneal Angiogenesis Assay | In vivo testing | Avascular, transparent environment | Measuring angiogenic responses |
Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) | In vivo screening | Highly vascular, accessible | Large-scale compound testing |
Aortic Ring Assay | Ex vivo research | Contains multiple cell types | Studies mimicking intact animal environment |
Each of these tools offers unique advantages. For instance, the corneal angiogenesis assay exploits the cornea's natural avascularity and transparency, allowing direct observation of new vessel growth. Meanwhile, the aortic ring assay provides a more complex environment that includes resident macrophages, pericytes, and fibroblasts that interact in ways that emulate angiogenesis in living organisms 6 .
Modern research has also revealed the limitations of early models. We now know endothelial cells are remarkably heterogeneousâthere are significant differences between cells from large and small blood vessels, between arteries and veins, and even between organs. This complexity explains why in vitro findings must always be confirmed in living organisms 6 .
Rather than simply trying to destroy all tumor vessels, researchers discovered that carefully calibrated anti-angiogenic therapy could actually "normalize" the chaotic, leaky vasculature typical of tumors. This normalized vascular network functions more efficiently, improving oxygen delivery and potentially enhancing the effectiveness of other treatments like chemotherapy and radiation 5 .
The future of angiogenesis research lies in these sophisticated combinationsâorchestrating multiple therapeutic approaches that target different aspects of tumor biology. The journey that began with Folkman's heretical hypothesis continues to evolve, offering new hope for patients across the spectrum of human disease.
What began as a specialized field in cancer biology has expanded to influence nearly every medical specialty. Ophthalmologists now use anti-VEGF therapies to treat macular degeneration, the leading cause of blindness in older adults. Cardiologists explore therapeutic angiogenesis to create "biological bypass" around blocked coronary arteries. Dermatologists apply angiogenesis principles to wound healing, and rheumatologists investigate them in inflammatory arthritis 8 .
This broadening impact demonstrates how a once-controversial idea can ripple across medicine, transforming diverse fields. The angiogenesis paradigm has proven so fruitful that approximately 40 publications with "angiogenesis" in the title now appear every week 8 .
Growth in angiogenesis publications over decades
The story of angiogenesis research embodies the very nature of scientific progress: radical ideas facing skepticism, gradual accumulation of evidence, unexpected discoveries, and eventual transformation of medical practice. What was once dismissed as heresy now represents a standard pillar of cancer treatment and a promising approach to numerous other conditions.
The revolution that began with Judah Folkman's persistence continues today in laboratories worldwide, where scientists keep unraveling the complex dance between blood vessels and diseaseâproving that sometimes, the most radical ideas become the most transformative medical breakthroughs.